|
||||||||
|
|---|
Ultra-Low Level Sensing of Biogenic Analytes |
|
|
|
Studies:
|
|
Figure
1: Demonstration of the S/N improvement attainable through use of pulse
voltammetry for analysis of a 300 nM H2O2
sample. For comparison, a CV of the same sample is also shown.
Figure 2: (a) Calibration curves for H2O2 detection using our redox mediator/pulse voltammetry method. (b) Apparent Michaelis-Menten behavior observed at increasing concentrations of H2O2. |
|
Significance: Biosensors developed for diagnostic analysis of target analytes (such as glucose and cholesterol) often depend on these analytes’ interaction with enzymes to catalytically generate hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which is then electrochemically oxidized to determine analyte concentrations. However, H2O2 oxidation poses many disadvantages when used in biological environments, including the physiologically extreme potentials required for its oxidation and its complex reaction mechanism at biological pH values. To avoid the problems inherent with direct H2O2 oxidation, we have developed a mediated, low-potential electrochemical method for bioanalyte detection (Scheme 1). In this scheme, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) that is either free in solution or immobilized at a substrate catalyzes the decomposition of enzymatically generated H2O2 to peroxy radicals, which are then reduced to water via oxidation of a mediator (med) to its redox-active form (medox). Medox is detected electrochemically at a GC electrode via a reversible, two-electron reduction step at -100 mV vs. Ag/AgCl. Because H2O2 oxidizes the mediator in a 1:1 ratio, the amount of free H2O2 created through enzyme-analyte interaction can be quantified at a lower, more biologically-friendly potential. We have further improved upon traditional peroxide-based electrochemical sensing methods by using pulse voltammetry3 to optimize sensing at ultralow concentrations (<1 µM) by eliminating background current contributions (Figure 1).4 Calibration curves obtained using our method, shown in Figure 2(a), are linear over five orders of magnitude (18 pM to 3 µM) and display significantly improved amperometric sensitivities compared to previously published electrochemical and optical peroxide detection methods.5 Our method is amenable to any detection scheme that uses enzymatically generated H2O2 for detection of a biogenic species. Future studies are focused on extending this scheme to quantitative analyte measurements in cells and tissues. In addition to offering quantitative biogenic analyte determination, this scheme also facilitates fundamental study of enzymatic activity through Lineweaver-Burke analysis to obtain kinetic parameters such as Michaelis-Menten (M-M) dissociation constants and enzyme turnover rates. Figure 2(b) shows the observed M-M behavior of our sensing scheme with increasing H2O2 concentration. We are currently using this method to evaluate the enzymatic integrity of biomolecules subjected to multiphoton-induced crosslinking in Dr. Jason Shear’s labs. |
|
Related Publications: (1) Heller, A. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 1999, 1, 153-175. (2) Wilson, G. S.; Hu, Y. Chemical Reviews (Washington, D. C.) 2000, 100, 2693-2704. (3) Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2001, pp 293-301. (4) Osteryoung, J.; O'Dea, J. J. In Electroanalytical Chemistry; Bard, A. J., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1986; Vol. 14, pp 209-308. (5) Greenway Gillian, M.; Leelasattarathkul, T.; Liawruangrath, S.; Wheatley, R. A.; Youngvises, N. The Analyst 2006, 131, 501-508. |
|
Students currently involved in this project: Jen Lyon |
![]() |